Enforcement of Awards in Hong Kong (2013)

Caseload and enforcement statistics for Hong Kong and HKIAC

HomeAt A GlanceStatisticsEnforcement of AwardsEnforcement of Awards in Hong Kong (2013)

Enforcement of Awards in Hong Kong: 2013

 

 
No of applications to enforce arbitral awards
No of applications to set aside order granting leave
No of orders set aside
Name of Appointing Authority
No of applications granted

1

CIETAC 1 (Beijing)

3

0

0

2

CIETAC (Shanghai)

1

0

0

3

Hong Kong (HKIA & HKIS) 2

1

0

0

4

Hong Kong (HKIAC) 3

7

14

0

5

Hong Kong 5

1

16

0

6

Jiaxing Arbitration 7

1

0

0

7

London 8

1

0

0

8

London (LCIA) 9

1

0

0

9

London (LMAA) 10

2

0

0

10

New York (ICDR) 11

1

0

0

11

Paris (ICC) 12

1

0

0

12

Shenzhen Arbitration Commission 13

1

0

0

13

Singapore (SIAC) 14

1

0

0

14

South China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission 15

2

0

0

15

United Kingdom (TAC) 16

1

0

0

16

United Kingdom 17

1

0

0

 

Total:

26

2

0

 

Note: Information provided by the Hong Kong Judiciary.
1 CIETAC: China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission 中國國際經濟貿易仲裁委員會
2 Hong Kong Institute of Architects (HKIA) and Hong Kong Institute of Surveyors (HKIS)
3 Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (HKIAC)
4 HCMP1187/2013 (Au J)
5 Sole Arbitrator, Hong Kong
6 HCCT 23/2013 (Mimmie Chan J)
7 嘉興仲裁委員會
8 Sole Arbitrator, London.
9 London Court of International Arbitration
10 London Maritime Arbitrators Association (LMAA).
11 International Centre for Dispute Resolution
12 International Chamber of Commerce
13 深圳仲裁委員會.
14 Singapore International Arbitration Centre
15 華南國際經濟貿易仲裁委員會.
16 Technical Appeal Committee of International Cotton Association Limited
17 Sole Arbitrator, United Kingdom
 

Share this